Document Type

Article

Publication Date

2017

Publication Title

Journal of Value Inquiry

Volume

51

Issue

4

First Page

641

Last Page

645

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10790-017-9613-x

Abstract

Many people believe that some things, like kidneys or sex, should not be for sale. Let us call these things “contested commodities.” Against this, Brennan and Jaworksi defend “markets without limits” (hereafter: MwL). According to this thesis: “If you may do it for free, you may do it for money.” Since we can give away our kidneys for free and have sex for free, we should be able to do these things for money. Brennan and Jaworksi deftly blend rigorous philosophical argument with the latest research in social science to counter some of the most prominent against commodification. But, I will argue, their arguments stop short of establishing MwL. Brennan and Jaworksi do not say enough in favor of markets in contested commodities.

Download

Share

COinS